Many people will find it helpful to know about toxic links, especially beginner webmasters. Please note: Here is some advice for those whose sites have come under Google’s medical filter.
“E-A-T (expertise, authority, trustworthiness) of a site, article or author depends indirectly on PageRank (links). Indeed, Google’s guidelines for assessors ask them, when evaluating E-A-T, to find information and links to the current object of analysis.
Having quality links can increase E-A-T, while poor quality links can lead to an algorithmic penalty and pessimization of both the individual page and the site as a whole.
Avoiding Toxic Links
Despite the claim that with the release of Penguin 4.0. unnatural and low-quality external links are no longer considered in the rankings. However, spammy links continue to affect the site (perhaps involving some other algorithms associated with evaluating the site’s quality as a whole).
It would help if you unloaded your link profile, assessed your links’ quality and naturalness, and followed the lousy link rejection procedure in Google. But, unfortunately, despite all the assurances that Google can automatically cut off poor-quality donors, this is not the case.
The site is algorithmically penalized, and analyzing links from the GSC (and rejecting bad ones) does nothing. We have to collect links from different sources, consolidate and explore all the links, and deny (disavow) the most malicious links. Use organic links in content.
A quality link consists of several factors:
- High quality of the donor.
- Close thematic.
- Natural placement of the link in the content.
- Traffic (clicks on the link).
In fact, the higher the E-A-T of the donor page, the quality of the link placed. It is desirable to have clicked by visitors to the donor on the link posted. If your site has been hit by a medical (quality) update, abandoning poisonous, low-quality links is one of the mandatory measures to restore traffic.
How to Determine Donor Toxicity
Google can algorithmically identify more than 50 factors that indicate a donor’s toxicity. These markers can add up for individual domains, increasing the potential risk of placing backlinks on them. So naturally, you should not put on toxic donors, and if you do, you should add such a domain to the disavow list and discard them.
The number of negative factors may be much higher, but there is not enough information about it. You need to understand what parameters tell Google that a donor is toxic. The search giant uses algorithms to easily calculate links from satellites, various PBNs, and other link networks. Better not apply link building on such domains.
In addition, as a rule, domains in the grid have low authority, a few incoming links. Therefore, there is minimal benefit from placing links in link networks.
A link can become toxic if placed on a low-quality domain and from the way you established it. The search engine quickly calculates unnatural, manipulative ways of placement.
These, for example, include link manipulation:
- Use monetary anchors in a link. Anchors containing keywords for which a domain is already ranking or trying to rank in the future may be judged by search engines as an attempt at link manipulation.
- Link placement in a link directory. Place links in unmoderated link directories with many other outbound links.
- Place a high density of outbound links. The page has an abnormally high density of external outbound links.
- End-to-end links. The donor site has an abnormally high number of links to the acceptor from different pages.
- Link from the guest post. A link leading from a guest post and having a monetary anchor may be considered unnatural by the PS.
- Irrelevant domains. Links from unrelated domains can lead to pessimization. However, we must remember that the Google site is a collection of documents, and relevance is determined not at the level of “Domain-Domain” but the level of “Page-Page.” Therefore, if you are creative, you can perfectly fit your article with a link in almost all subjects.
Get Rid of Negative Factors
There are prohibitive markers, which, if identified, should not be placed on a link. If you’re looking for quality promotion services, follow this link: decipherzone.com. These include:
- Domain participation in automatic link exchanges (sape, xap, link feed, liex, etc.).
- Lack of traffic on the donor domain and not indexed.
- The presence of “prohibited” topics or ranking on the “poisonous” keywords (sex, porn, essays, adult, etc.).
- The presence of “viruses” on the site or links to malware.
Other toxicity markers may be less dangerous and do not always indicate a refusal to post a link.
The negative factors may include technical problems with the site. And it is worth analyzing both desktop and mobile versions. For example, the presence of a significant number of “broken” pages reduces the attractiveness of linking to the site, no matter how great the performance. The fact is that without a “repair,” such a site will sooner or later drop out of rendering. Likewise, you should not place on projects overflowing with aggressive advertising.
Amir khan currently resides at the bustling intersection of technology and everyday life. He believes that having Art in the right hand and learning Science through left, this blend will lead you toward the actual decency of the universe.